Uygun, T., Sendur, A., Dere, R., & Ozcakir, B. (2023). Development of TPACK with web 2.0 tools: Design-based study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12907 Abstract: “This mixed-method study, which aimed to examine the development of teacher candidates, was organized as a design-based study. During the 14-week instructional…
Comments closedTag: Web 2.0
Jimoyiannis, A. (2015). TPACK 2.0: Towards a framework guiding Web 2.0 integration in educational practice. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), New directions in technological pedagogical content knowledge: Multiple perspectives (pp. 83-108). Information Age. Abstract: None
Comments closedBilici, S. C. (2016). An examination of science teachers’ knowledge structures towards technology. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(5), 571-586. http://www.ijese.net/makale/112.html Abstract: “The purpose of the study was to examine science teachers’ knowledge structures on technology, who participated in a TPACK-based Professional Development (PD) program. The PD program was…
Comments closedTatli, Z., & Altinisik, H. (2016). The impact of web 2.0 tools on pre-service teachers’ self-confidence levels about TPCK. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 659-678. doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.277878 Abstract: “The purpose of this study is to enable pre-service teachers from various fields to develop materials in their fields through practices…
Comments closedKorucu, A. T. (2017). Teachers’ technology acceptance and usage situations and the evaluation of web pedagogic content knowledge in terms of different variations and the determination of the relationship between these. International Education Studies, 10(3), 54-75. doi:10.5539/ies.v10n3p54 Abstract: “The goal of this study is to analyze the situations of teachers’ technology…
Comments closedBustamante, C. (2017). TPACK and teachers of Spanish: Development of a theory-based joint display in a mixed methods research case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817712119 Abstract: “This article describes the development of a joint display in a mixed methods research case study, using a theoretical framework as…
Comments closedParkison, P., & Thomas, J. A. (2018). Using web 2.0 tools to engage content, promote self-efficacy, and implications for intentional student learning. In R. C. Sharma (Ed.), Innovative applications of online pedagogy and course design (pp. 42-62). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5466-0.ch003 Abstract: “This chapter defines Web 2.0 tools, their use in…
Comments closedKaralar, H., & Aslan Altan, B. (2018). New technologies in microteaching: Is it possible for web 2.0 tools to affect prospective teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and teacher self-efficacy? International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(3), 535–551. Retrieved from http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/353 Abstract: “The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of…
Comments closedTeo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: A Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290 Abstract: “In recent years, there has been an exponential growth of the explorations around the pedagogical use of…
Comments closed