Kulaksiz, T. (2023). Does individual innovativeness influence TPACK development?: The case of pre-service EFL Ttachers in Türkiye. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.5914 Abstract: “This study aims to investigate how pre-service EFL teachers’ individual innovativeness levels affect their TPACK development during an educational technology course. Employing a quasi-experimental…
Comments closedTag: innovation
Law, N., Yuen, A., & Fox, R. (2011). Educational innovations beyond technology: Nurturing leadership and establishing learning organizations. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_11 Abstract: The text explores the concept of innovation, and analyse and compare different dimensions of innovation found in the various case studies; the transfer of innovation…
Comments closedDaniel, E. G. S. (2015). Be it elementary or tertiary level of biology that we teach, we need TPACK. In E. G. S. Daniel (Ed.), Biology education and research in a changing planet (pp. 215–225). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-524-2 Abstract: “Whether one is teaching elementary science or genome biology, the ability to…
Comments closedKhushk, A., Zhiying, L., Yi, X., & Zengtian, Z. (2023). Technology innovation in STEM education: A review and analysis. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 19, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.7883 Abstract: “The study examines research articles on STEM education and its technology innovation that have been indexed by the Scopus, Web…
Comments closedSalma, A., & Hernandez, J. (2023). Identifying in-service teachers’ perceptions of developing 21st century skills through science education using TPACK-21 framework. In J. Trumble, S. Asim, J. Ellis, & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Theoretical and practical teaching strategies for K-12 science education in the digital age (pp. 151-174). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5585-2.ch009…
Comments closed