Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Grounded tech integration: Math. Learning & Leading With Technology, 37(3), 24-26. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationpubs/10/ Abstract: “Teachers today can choose from a variety of technologies for teaching mathematics. Drill-and-practice software, virtual manipulatives, real-life data sets, interactive geometry programs, graphing calculators, robots, and computer-based laboratories are…
Comments closedCategory: Journal article
Figg, C. & McCartney, R. (2010). Impacting academic achievement with student learners teaching digital storytelling to others: The ATTTCSE digital video project. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1). http://www.citejournal.org/vol10/iss1/languagearts/article3.cfm Abstract: “University researchers, teacher candidates, language and technology instructors, student learners, and families from diverse backgrounds partnered in an…
Comments closedBlanchard, M. R., Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2010). Grounded tech integration: Science. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(6). 32-34. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationpubs/7/ Abstract: “The article discusses the application of grounded technology integration in teaching science. The authors point out that one strategy that will allow teachers to integrate technology effectively is…
Comments closedTrautmann, N. M., & MaKinster, J. G. (2010). Flexibly adaptive professional development in support of teaching science with geospatial technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9181-4 Abstract: “The flexibly adaptive model of professional development, developed in the GIT Ahead project, enables secondary science teachers to incorporate a variety of geospatial…
Comments closedThompson, A. D., & Schmidt, D. (2010). Second-generation TPACK: Emphasis on research and practice. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4), 125. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402454.2010.10784644 Abstract: None
Comments closedSchmidt, D., Harris, J. & Hofer, M. (2010). “Grounded” technology integration using K-6 literacy learning activity types. Learning & Leading With Technology, 37(6). 30-32. Abstract: None
Comments closedRichardson, K. W. (2010). TPACK: Game on. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(8), 34-35. Abstract: None
Comments closedPolly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching & Teacher Education, 26(4), 863-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024 Abstract: “This article uses the framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK; Mishra & Koehler, 2006) to analyze findings…
Comments closedPierson, M., & Borthwick, A. (2010). Framing the assessment of educational technology professional development in a culture of learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4), 126-131. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/55479/ Abstract: “Assessing the effectiveness of educational technology professional development (ETPD) must go beyond obtaining feedback from participants about their level of…
Comments closedÖzgün-Koca, A. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2009/2010). Preservice teachers’ emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10-20. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/tme/article/view/1939 Abstract: “There is a dearth of research on the mechanisms for preservice teachers’ development of the pedagogical knowledge necessary for effective use of such technologies.…
Comments closed