Hubber, P., & Loong, E. (2013). Increasing learner engagement of learning technologies and science TPACK through representational challenges. In C. Wankel, & P. Blessinger (Eds.) Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies (pp. 83-112). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006G006 Abstract: “There have been…
Comments closedMonth: January 2024
Zhan, Y., Quan, J., & Ren, Y. (2013). An empirical study on the technological pedagogical content knowledge development of pre-service mathematics teachers in China. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 199-212. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053600 Abstract: “Based on the research theories and methods of the TPACK model, an empirical…
Comments closedWu, Y-T. (2013). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research: A review of empirical studies published in selected journals from 2002 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E73-E76. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01349.x Abstract (excerpt): “The TPACK framework has been recognized as an important theoretical foundation for technology integration research,…
Comments closedWhite, B., & Geer, R. (2013). Preservice teachers [sic] experience with online modules about TPACK. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 124-132. Abstract: “Despite the fact that Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is valued as a tool for learning, the modelling [sic] for preservice teachers of ICT integration in the curriculum areas…
Comments closedTokmak, H. S. (2013). Changing preschool teacher candidates’ perceptions about technology integration in a TPACK-based material design course. Education as Change, 17(1), 115-129. http://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.773927 Abstract: “This qualitative case study investigates how preschool teacher candidates’ perceptions about technology integration change during the technology-rich Material Design course that was based on the…
Comments closedTerry, L., Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., Wolf, L., & Kereluik, K. (2013). The reciprocal relationship between technology and psychology. Tech Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(3), 34-39. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0660-2 Abstract: “This article describes the design and implementation of the year 2 curriculum and student learning experiences in the…
Comments closedShih, C-L., & Chuang, H-H. (2013). The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Computers & Education, 63, 109-118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.021 Abstract: “Research in the area of educational technology has argued that the technological pedagogical content knowledge of faculty is…
Comments closedSadaf, A., Newby, T.J. & Ertmer, P.A. (2013). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782602 Abstract: “This study investigated factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0…
Comments closedSaad, M., Barbar, A. M., & Abourjelli, S. A. R. (2012). Introduction of TPACK-XL for building pre-service teacher knowledge base. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 41-58. http://tujted.com/makale/616 Abstract: “What is the nature of preservice teachers’ knowledge base that enables them teach with technology? How preservice teacher education programs should…
Comments closed