{"id":1314,"date":"2021-11-04T11:27:03","date_gmt":"2021-11-04T15:27:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tpack.pages.wm.edu\/?p=1314"},"modified":"2021-11-04T11:27:03","modified_gmt":"2021-11-04T15:27:03","slug":"1314","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/archives\/1314","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>McClure, J., &amp; Pilgrim, J. (2021). Implementing a 1:1 technology program in a rural, public school: A study of perceptions of technology integration.\u00a0<em>Journal of Research on Technology in Education<\/em>, <em>54<\/em>(2), 302-316.\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15391523.2020.1852455\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15391523.2020.1852455<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Abstract: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Rural communities face unique challenges that can complicate techno-logical integration and impact the effectiveness of 1:1 technology initiatives. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore teachers\u2019 and administrators\u2019 perceptions of technology integration after implementing a1:1 initiative in a rural, public district. Three primary themes emerged. First, the combination of technology and pedagogy is an essential part of 1:1program success. Secondly, technology must be combined with content knowledge. Finally, there are benefits and challenges of rural settings. Students gain experiences, and schools see increased student engagement. However, lower levels of connectivity and longer bus rides impact students\u2019 ability to complete their work. Support received at home is impacted by parental hesitancy and a lower level of technical ability of the parents.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>McClure, J., &amp; Pilgrim, J. (2021). Implementing a 1:1 technology program in a rural, public school: A study of perceptions of technology integration.\u00a0Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 302-316.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15391523.2020.1852455 Abstract: &#8220;Rural communities face unique challenges that can complicate techno-logical integration and impact the effectiveness of 1:1 technology initiatives.&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/archives\/1314\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"><\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,14],"tags":[65,345,479,555,562],"coauthors":[2301],"class_list":["post-1314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journal-article","category-empirical-research","tag-teacher-perceptions","tag-rural","tag-public-education","tag-11-pedagogy","tag-technology-integration","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1314\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1314"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tpack.org\/tpackrefs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}