Bull, G., & Bell, L. (2009). TPACK: A framework for the CITE Journal. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/editorial/tpack-a-framework-for-the-cite-journal Introduction: In 1986 Lee Shulman proposed that crucial aspects of pedagogical practice are uniquely connected to specific content areas and coined the term “pedagogical content knowledge.” Extension of the concept to “technological…
Comments closedMonth: February 2024
So, H.-J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1183 Abstract: “What should constitute knowledge bases that we expect our future teachers to gain related to pedagogically sound technology integration? Employing the Shulman’s teacher…
Comments closedHarris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and learning activity types. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536 Abstract: “In this paper we critically analyze extant approaches to technology integration in teaching, arguing that many current methods are technocentric, often omitting…
Comments closedPolly, D., & Brantley-Dias, L. (2009). TPACK: Where do we go now? TechTrends, 53(5), 46-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4 Abstract: “TPACK gives a holistic perspective of the knowledge associated with effectively integrating technology into learning environments, accounting for what teachers know and what teachers do. TPACK provides a robust framework for thinking about…
Comments closedNelson, J., Christopher, A., & Mims, C. (2009). TPACK and Web 2.0: Transformation of teaching and learning. TechTrends, 53(5), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0329-z Abstract: “Web 2.0 technologies provide possibilities for sharing and building knowledge. Teachers who facilitate collaborative and interdisciplinary projects build on the unique strengths of individual students and encourage the…
Comments closedMishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0325-3 Abstract: “The TPACK framework emphasizes the role of teachers as decision makers who design their own educational technology environments as needed, in real time,…
Comments closedGraham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0 Abstract: “In this study we piloted an instrument for measuring confidence levels in four of the seven…
Comments closedCox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1 Abstract: “The introduction of the TPACK model by Mishra and Koehler (2006) has had a profound impact on the field of…
Comments closedBarbour, M., Rieber, L. P., Thomas, G., & Rauscher, D. (2009). Homemade PowerPoint games: A constructionist alternative to WebQuests. TechTrends, 53(5), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0326-2 Abstract: “Students are required to use PowerPoint to construct home made content-based games. To construct these games, students write a game narrative or story (i.e., a short…
Comments closed